Serbia-NATO: From hostility to close collaboration

At this year’s Belgrade Security Forum, we had the opportunity to hear an exchange of views on the current cooperation between Serbia and NATO between Deputy Secretary-General Rose Gottemoeller and Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabić.

On both sides, it was emphasized that relations and the cooperation between Serbia and the Alliance are taking place at a high level. In addition, it is asserted that there was an understanding on the side of NATO that Serbia currently does not have an aspiration for membership, thus emphasizing it was Serbian sovereign decision which NATO would not interfere with. Such cooperation represents a significant difference in comparison with relations that existed during the 1990s.

Want to open a company in Serbia? Click here!

Relations between Serbia and NATO, since the break-up of the SFRY up until the present day, could be described as turbulent, from utmost hostility to current closer cooperation and strengthening of relations without open political issues. In the wake of the conflicts in the territory of the former Yugoslavia, when the federal state began to dismantle, the adoption of a new strategic concept of NATO at the Rome summit in late 1991 took place. With the adoption of this document, the framework of the organization was significantly expanded and it was given a task to provide a stable security environment in Europe. In the context of the break-up of Yugoslavia, this was an announcement of what would later happen in terms of regulating regional security. Under Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, NATO had no authority to act outside the territory of its members, but the new strategic concept was an introduction to later decisions to act militarily outside the territory of the member states, even though they were not endangered.

The history of relations between Serbia and NATO could be divided into the period of conflict in the territory of the former Yugoslavia, until the signing of the Military-technical agreement in the famous tent in the NATO military base near Kumanovo, and the period of the changes in Serbia initiated by the “5 October” events, followed by new foreign policy objectives of the country. These goals included European and Euro-Atlantic integration and the return of the country to the international scene after a period of isolation.

At the beginning of the Yugoslav crisis, NATO expressed its concern over possible spilling over of the conflict in the region, but mostly over human casualties and further escalation of the conflict. NATO, for the first time, acted outside the territory of the member states to support the valid UN resolutions pertinent to BiH, and after signing the Dayton Agreement, it took on itself the task of guaranteeing the implementation of Dayton, in particular, provisions pertaining to the military aspects of the treaty.

The second active involvement of NATO during the 1990s is related to the Kosovo crisis, when the first reaction of the UN Security Council condemned the excessive use of force by Serb forces over civilians, and at the same time condemned the KLA acts as terrorist. As the situation in Kosovo worsened, NATO was also closer to the intervention, so that by the end of 1998 the NATO Council approved the activation of an air strikes order. At the last moment, it was decided to support the diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis peacefully. This involved the withdrawal of Serb forces from Kosovo and Metohija. The turning point, however, were the events in the village of Račak and the failed negotiations in Rambouillet, after which NATO, although without the mandate of the UN Security Council, launched air strikes against the FRY.

With the conclusion of the Kumanovo Agreement between the International Security Forces KFOR (the NATO-led peacekeeping force) and Serbian armed forces and the adoption of Resolution 1244, an international military and security presence in Kosovo under the supervision of the UN was established, along with NATO’s leading role in preserving peace and security, and the military campaign against FRY was over.

Following the fall of the regime of Slobodan Milošević, the country began to re-orientate towards European and Euro-Atlantic integration. In the atmosphere of a new climate in 2002, three specific foreign policy goals were set up: signing the Stabilization and Association Agreement with the European Union, membership in the Council of Europe and the accession to the NATO Partnership for Peace program (PfP).

It is interesting to note that the support of the public opinion for NATO membership was much higher at the onset of the new millennium, after the bombardment and the October changes, than is the case today. The reason for this can be traced in the desire not only of the ruling political elite but also of citizens to re-acquire the membership in international organizations and institutions after isolation and wars and embark on EU and NATO integration process, which was ongoing in other countries of the region. However, the assassination of Zoran Đinđic and the arrival of the new government led by Koštunica slowed down the process of reforms. The government headed by Koštunica changed its ideological agenda, having approached the right-wing national pole, which gradually led to siding with Russia.

By the end of 2006, NATO opened a Military Liaison Office in Belgrade in order to support defense sector reforms and facilitate Serbia’s participation in the Partnership for Peace activities, whereas, in the following year, Serbia joined the Partnership for Peace Planning and Review Process (PARP), which aimed to direct and measure progress in the transformation of the defense and military sectors.

In 2007, the National Assembly passed the Resolution on the Protection of the Sovereignty, Territorial Integrity and the Constitutional Order of the Republic of Serbia, which, in its Article 6, emphasized the decision to proclaim the military neutrality of the Republic of Serbia in relation to the existing military alliances until eventual referendum in which a final decision on the matter would take place.

What is less known is that since 2007, Serbia has been an active participant in the NATO program for Peace and Security (SPS),

Further development of Serbia-NATO relations follows the ratification of the Agreement on the Status of Forces (SOFA), based on which NATO in Serbia exercises freedom of movement and can use complete military infrastructure. In the same year, Serbia and NATO signed an Agreement for support and procurement of cooperation in the field of logistical support. According to this agreement, NATO members will have the same privileges and immunity like diplomats under the Vienna Convention.

The Head of NATO’s Liaison Office in Belgrade is optimistic about the further cooperation of Serbia and NATO, especially if we have in mind that since the “visit of Secretary General Stoltenberg in 2015, the Agreement on the Status of Forces (SOFA) has been signed, mutual activities and cooperation have increased, but there is still room for their improvement”.

As early as 2016, Prime Minister Vučić visited NATO headquarters, which was the first official meeting of the Serbian Prime Minister and the North Atlantic Council, thus making a leap forward in strengthening relations and cooperation between Serbia and NATO. The latest visit by senior NATO officials, Deputy Secretary-General Rose Gottemoeller, occurred during the Belgrade Security Forum this year, 

Of course, it remains on political elites to decide on whether this relationship will continue to be based exclusively on respecting military neutrality, or whether Serbia will redefine its position on the issue and, for the first time, adopt a foreign policy strategy in order to clearly define and codify its goals.

By Vuk Velebit,

(EWB, 15.11.2017)



This post is also available in: Italiano

Share this post

One Reply to “Serbia-NATO: From hostility to close collaboration”

  1. Hannah Montcolly says:

    For one moment I thought I was hearing closer co-operation between Serbia and NATO…..really….sounds about as likely as Ana Brnabic being voted in by an Orthodox Christian voter….not that USA/EU would be interfering with voting outcome…..that is accordingly what the Russians do…..not the good free democracy of the West…..the more Serbia begins to sound like the liberal West, the more she begins to sound un-Orthodox, un-Serbian…..and much more like America and Europe in a Serb accent…..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

scroll to top